I’m one of the founders at Scrapbox. We’re a tiny product & AI engineering team that lives in the messy gap between a founder’s fuzzy vision and the first real users. We don’t have time for hype cycles that burn budget and stall momentum. What follows isn’t a futurist’s wish list—it’s what we actually see influencing speed, quality, and outcomes across MVPs, internal tools, and AI‑powered products we’re building in 2025.
If you only skim, focus on: AI evaluation over raw prompting, vertical slices, pragmatic platform picks, observability from Day 1, security-by-default, smaller model strategy, cost telemetry, front‑end performance budgets, design system discipline, and intentional constraint culture. Nail those and you out-ship bigger teams.
Everyone can bolt GPT-4 (or its successors) onto a feature. Few teams set up automated prompt + output tests, regression scoring, or fallback logic. In 2025, the win is building a lightweight eval harness (golden test prompts + scoring rubric + drift alerts) so AI features stay consistent as models shift.
Founder takeaway: Budget one early sprint for eval scaffolding; it pays back every time the model updates.
Shipping thin, end‑to‑end slices (tiny piece of UI → API → data → instrumentation) each week keeps feedback loops tight. Layered builds (all UI first, then API, etc.) still die in internal review purgatory.
Founder takeaway: Every sprint should end with something a user (or test user) can click.
We keep seeing flashy experimental frameworks slow teams down. A stable base (Next.js/React, Node/Nest or Django, Flutter or React Native, Postgres) plus a small number of intentional bets (e.g., edge functions for latency-critical paths) wins.
Founder takeaway: Define a 90‑day “approved stack” list; revisit quarterly, not impulsively.
Logging, tracing, basic dashboards, and an error alert channel used to be “post-launch.” By the time you add them late, you’re guessing. Early observability shrinks bug hunt time and gives you usage breadcrumbs for roadmap calls.
Founder takeaway: Instrument activation events (first project created, first data import, etc.) before launch day.
Founders finally ask, “Is this secure enough?” earlier. Baseline we bake in: least-privilege roles, secret rotation, dependency scanning, HTTPS headers, rate limiting, audit trail for sensitive actions. No SOC 2 theater—just cheap risk reduction.
Founder takeaway: Maintain a 1-page living “Security Checklist” and tick it every release.
Not every feature needs the largest frontier LLM. Teams are routing: cheap small model → heuristic checks → large model fallback only when confidence is low. This slashes inference cost and latency.
Founder takeaway: Track cost per successful task, not just per 1K tokens.
Cloud + AI bills spike quietly. We now wire per-request cost metrics (tokens, storage, egress) into the same dashboards as adoption. That lets us kill wasteful endpoints early.
Founder takeaway: Add a cost_estimate field to key logs from Day 1.
Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP) directly change conversion and retention. Teams are setting “<2.5s LCP on 4G mid-tier device” as a budget per feature, not an afterthought.
Founder takeaway: Add a quick Lighthouse CI check to PRs; fail builds that regress budget.
Sloppy, divergent UI slows iteration. A lightweight token set (spacing, color, typography) + 12–15 core components prevents entropy and speeds new feature mockups.
Founder takeaway: Invest a single focused week creating components; reuse ruthlessly.
We’ve leaned harder into explicit constraints: limited active initiatives, capped PR size, decision SLAs (e.g., architecture decisions in <48h), and a standard “Why this feature now?” doc. Constraints create speed by eliminating decision drag.
Founder takeaway: Publish your 5 operating constraints; treat violations as signal.
Focus
Stack lock + security baseline + observability
Quick Wins
Approved tech doc, error alert channel live, security checklist started
Focus
First vertical slice w/ AI eval harness
Quick Wins
Golden prompt set + cost logging added
Focus
Slice expansion + design system build
Quick Wins
12 core components + Lighthouse CI passing
Focus
Hybrid model routing + perf tuning + cost reviews
Quick Wins
Cost per task dashboard; performance budget stable
Q: Which of these trends matter first for a tiny team (≤5 devs)?
Prioritize: vertical slice delivery, ruthless scope, baseline security, and instrumentation. AI integration and platform abstraction (multi-cloud, hybrid search) can wait unless they directly unlock your core user value.
Q: How do I decide if an AI feature is a differentiator or a distraction?
Ask: (1) Does AI materially increase speed to value for the user? (2) Can we measure its success with a single user-facing metric? (3) Would the product still solve the core problem without it? If #3 is “yes,” build the non-AI path first, then layer AI enhancement.
Q: We’re tempted to add microservices early—bad idea?
Usually. Until you feel painful deployment or scaling contention, a modular monolith (clear domain folders + internal interfaces) maximizes speed and minimizes cognitive overhead.
Q: What’s a healthy early release cadence?
Weekly minimum visible increments. Many high-performing small teams ship prod updates daily or even continuously—focus on shrinking batch size, not cramming more into weekly sprints.
Q: How deep should observability go for an MVP?
You need: structured logs for key flows, a simple error alert (email/Slack), and a usage dashboard for your activation metric. Full distributed tracing / complex anomaly detection can wait.
If you want a sanity check on your 0→1 roadmap, we’ll happily do a free 20‑minute “Intention Audit”: scope, stack, instrumentation. (No hard pitch—if we’re not a fit, you still get the audit results.)
Book a quick slot → https://calendly.com/scrapbox-team